By now even the most reluctant are beginning to open their eyes. An organized plan exists to destabilize Europe through migratory invasion. This project hails from the distant past. In my book from the nineties, 1900-2000 Two dreams follow one another: the construction, the destruction. (Fiducia, Rome 1990), I described this plan through the words of some of its disciples, such as Umberto Eco the writer and Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini.
Eco wrote: “In Europe today we are not faced with a phenomenon of immigration. We are faced with a migratory phenomenon […] and like all of the great migrations it will have as its final outcome an ethnic readjustment in the lands of destination, an inexorable change in customs, unstoppable interbreeding which will statistically change the skin, hair and eye colour of populations.” Cardinal Martini, on his part, considered “a prophetic choice” necessary: in order to understand that “the migratory process in act from the increasingly poor South towards the increasingly rich North is a great ethical and civil opportunity for renewal, to reverse the course of decadent consumerism in act in Western Europe.
From this perspective of “creative destruction”, I made the comment, “it would not be the immigrants that needed to integrate into European civilization, but the contrary; Europe would need to ‘dis-integrate’ and regenerate thanks to the ethnic groups which occupy it […]. It is the dream of creative disorder, of a shake-up similar to the one which gave new life to the West at the time of the Barbarian Invasions to generate the poly-cultural society of the future”.
The plan was, and remains, that of destroying the National States and their Christian roots, not in order to build a Super-state, but to create a non-State, a horrid void, in which all that has the semblance of the true, the good and the just is swallowed up in an abyss of chaos. Post-modernity is this: not a plan of “construction”, as had been the pseudo-civilization born of humanism and the Enlightenment and which afterwards resulted in the totalitarianisms of the 20th century, but a new and different utopia: the deconstruction and tribalisation of Europe.
The aim of the revolutionary process which has been attacking our civilisation for many centuries, is Nihilism; “armed nothingness” according to an appropriate expression by Monsignor Jean-Joseph Gaume (1802-1879).
The years have passed and the utopia of chaos has turned into the nightmare we are now living. The plan of Europe’s disintegration, described by Alberto Carosa and Giudo Vignelli (in their documented study The Silent Invasion. “Immigration”: resource or conspiracy? (Rome 2002) has become an epoch-changing phenomenon. Those who denounced this plan were called “prophets of doom”. Today we hear that we are dealing with an unstoppable process, which must be “governed”, but cannot be restrained. The same was said in the 70s and 80s of last century about Communism, until the fall of the Berlin Wall showed that nothing is irreversible in history, except perhaps the blindness of the “useful idiots”.
Among these useful idiots surely to be numbered are the Mayors of New York, Paris, and London: Bill de Blasio, Anne Hidalgo and Sadiq Khan. On September 20th for the occasion of the General Assembly at the United Nations, in a letter published in the New York Times entitled Our immigrants, our strength, they launched an appeal “to take decisive measures in guaranteeing aid and safe refuge to refugees fleeing conflicts and immigrants fleeing poverty”.
The hundreds of thousands of immigrants who are landing on our coasts are fleeing neither conflicts nor poverty. They are young and in excellent health, well-groomed, with no signs of wounds or malnutrition, as happen to those who come from war or hunger-zones. The coordinator of anti-terrorism in the European Union, Gilles de Kerchove, when speaking to the European Parliament on September 26th, denounced a massive infiltration of ISIS among these immigrants. Yet, even if the terrorists were a scant minority among them, all the illegal-immigrants that are landing in Europe are bringers of an incompatible culture to the Christian and Western one.
The migrants do not want to integrate into Europe, but want to dominate it, if not with arms, through the wombs of their women and ours. Wherever these groups of young Islamic males settle, the European women get pregnant, new “mixed” families are formed – subject to the law of the Koran – and the new families ask the Government for mosques and economic subsidies. This transpires with the support of mayors, prefectures and Catholic parishes.
The reaction of the population is inevitable and in the countries with the highest rate of immigration, like France and Germany, it is becoming explosive. “We are on the verge of a civil war” declared Patrick Calvar, Head of the DGSI, the General Direction of French Internal Security, before a parliamentary commission (Le Figaro, June 22nd 2016). The German government, for its part, drafted a “plan for civil defence” of 69 pages, in which the population is invited to stock up on food and water and “prepare in an appropriate way for an event that could threaten our existence” (Reuters, August 21st 2016)
Who is responsible for this situation? We need to look for them on many levels. There is naturally the ‘68er-post-Communist ruling class who have taken over the reins of European politics; there are the intellectuals who have elaborated deformed theories in the field of physics, biology, sociology and politics; and there are the lobbies, the masonries, the powerful financiers, who at times act in darkness, at times in broad daylight.
It is well-known, for example, the role of the financier George Soros and his international foundation Open Society. Following a hacker attack, more than 2,500 emails were stolen from the American-Hungarian magnate’s server and diffused on the Internet through the DC Leaks portal. From the private correspondence taken from Soros, his financing of subversive activities in all fields has emerged, from the LGTB agenda to the pro-immigration movements. In a series of articles on The Remnant and drawing on these documents, Elizabeth Yore has shown Soros’ support, direct and indirect, also for Pope Francis and some of his closest collaborators, like Cardinal Oscar Andres Rodríguez Maradiaga and Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo.
Between George Soros and Pope Francis a strategic objective convergence has appeared. The politics of hospitality, presented as the “ religion of bridges” opposed to the “religion of walls”, has become the leitmotif of Francis’ papacy, to such an extent that some are asking if his election was favoured specifically with the aim of offering the authors of the migratory invasion the moral “endorsement” they needed. What is certain is that today the confusion in the Church and in society are advancing hand in hand. The political chaos is preparing [the way] for a civil war, the religious chaos is opening the road to schisms, which are a type of religious civil war.
Nevertheless, the Holy Spirit, Whom the cardinals in conclave are not always in conformity with, never ceases to operate and nourish the sensus fidei today of those who oppose the demolition plans to destroy the Church and society. Divine Providence will never abandon them.
